Computer Vision in Warehousing: Pallet Counting, Inventory Accuracy & Safety

not found
Modern warehouses are under pressure from every direction: faster delivery promises, volatile demand, and tight labor markets. Underneath all of that is a quieter problem that eats margin every single day: inaccurate inventory and preventable errors.
Studies compiling retail and logistics data show that the average retail operation has inventory accuracy of only around 63%, meaning over one-third of what is “on the books” is wrong in reality. That inaccuracy drives stockouts, overstocks, emergency replenishment, and lost sales.
On the outbound side, multiple surveys of distribution centers found that mispicks alone cost a typical facility around USD 390,000 per year, with each mispick often costing between USD 20–75 per incident when you include labor, shipping, and recovery.
Add to that the human cost: recent safety reports suggest that forklifts account for roughly a quarter of warehouse injuries globally, and in the US are associated with thousands of injuries and around 100 deaths every year.
This is the context in which AI-powered computer vision is reshaping warehousing — bringing “always-on eyes” to pallets, SKUs, and safety risks that were previously invisible in real time.

1. Why Warehouses Need Better Eyes, Not Just Better Reports

Most warehouses already measure something: pick rates, order accuracy, dock-to-stock time. But there are structural gaps:
  • Inventory records lag reality
Studies summarizing retail and warehouse operations consistently put average inventory accuracy in the low-60% range, with some improvement where RFID or advanced systems are deployed.
  • Mispicks quietly erode margin
Intermec-based research and later analyses show that a single mispick averages around USD 22–30 and that annual mispick losses cluster around USD 389k–390k per distribution center.
  • “Good enough” accuracy is not actually good enough
Industry commentary points out that even an order accuracy of 98.5% can still translate into hundreds of mis-shipments per week for high-volume operations
  • Safety incidents are still common and expensive
Forklift injury statistics from safety bodies show tens of thousands of non-fatal forklift injuries annually and dozens of deaths, with turnovers a major cause.
Traditional scanners, manual counts, and paper- or RF-based picking alone cannot close these gaps. Computer vision addresses a different layer of the problem: turning live video and images into structured, real-time operational data.

2. What Computer Vision in Warehousing Actually Does

At its core, warehouse computer vision uses cameras + AI models to understand what’s happening with pallets, cartons, people, and equipment in real time.
A typical stack includes:
  • 1. Imaging at key points
  • Dock doors, pallet staging areas, fork-truck aisles, conveyor merges, and high-bay racks.
  • Cameras (fixed, pole-mounted, tunnel, or mast-mounted) capture pallets, labels, and cases as work happens.
  • 2. AI models trained for logistics
  • Object detection and counting (pallets, cartons, totes).
  • Text and barcode recognition on labels.
  • Pose and zone analysis to detect unsafe behavior, near-misses, and PPE compliance.
  • 3. Real-time decisions and events
  • “This pallet has 48 cases but WMS expects 45.”
  • “This trailer is only 70% utilized.”
  • “A forklift just crossed into a pedestrian-only zone.”
Global logistics players explicitly describe how they use computer vision to analyze pallet dimensions and orientation, optimize roller cages, and monitor yard traffic, turning video into structured events that feed warehouse and transport systems.

3. Core Use Cases (with Real Public Case Studies)

3.1 Pallet Counting, Ti-Hi, and Auditing

Pallet miscounts and mis-labelled loads are a classic source of inventory mismatches and dock disputes. Traditional Ti-Hi counting (tiers × height) often relies on manual checks.
Warehouse-focused computer vision vendors report that automated Ti-Hi scanning systems can capture pallet case counts in seconds, validate them against WMS expectations, and flag discrepancies immediately, drastically reducing manual labor and audit time.

One industrial case study on pallet part counting found that manual pallet SKU counting took 20–25 seconds per pallet and resulted in miscount rates of 20–22%, creating serious inventory mismatches. By replacing manual counts with a four-camera machine-vision system that captures all four sides of the pallet, the facility was able to automate counts and eliminate the high error rate.

In practice, this means:
  • Faster receiving and put-away
  • Fewer short-ships or over-ships
  • Cleaner inventory records for finance and planning teams
For a platform like Objiq, pallet-level vision becomes the “ground truth” that WMS and ERP rely on.

3.2 Package and Carton Counting on Conveyors

Counting cartons manually at choke points (like sorter outputs or lane diverts) is both boring and error-prone. Several warehouse vision providers document deployments where:
  • Cameras mounted above conveyors automatically count packages and confirm lane assignment.
  • Counts and images are stored as proof for customer disputes or carrier reconciliation.
These systems are positioned as a way to replace spot checks with 100% visual coverage, while making it possible to audit what happened on a specific shift or trailer by replaying footage and associated metadata.

3.3 Inventory Accuracy and Cycle Counting

Inventory studies highlight that average US retail and warehouse inventory accuracy hovers around the low-to-mid 60% range, and that moving to item-level tagging and better systems can push accuracy up into the 90s.

Computer vision complements those improvements by:
  • Automating cycle counts as pallets or totes move under cameras.
  • Capturing images of racks and bins to detect empty locations that should be full (or vice versa).
  • Supporting exception-based counting, where the system only asks humans to verify anomalies.
Warehouse-vision case studies describe customers that doubled inventory count accuracy within the first month of deploying automated cycle counts, while reducing shrinkage and improving service levels.

3.4 Safety: Forklifts, People, and Near-Miss Analytics

Forklifts are indispensable – and dangerous. Safety analyses show that forklifts are involved in tens of thousands of injuries and around 75–100 fatalities per year in the US alone, and can account for about 25% of warehouse injuries globally.
Computer vision helps by:
  • Detecting pedestrians in forklift aisles and triggering alerts.
  • Flagging blocked fire exits, blind-spot behavior, or speeding equipment.
  • Capturing near misses (not just actual accidents), so safety teams have data to act before a serious incident.
Major logistics and automation vendors now explicitly frame computer vision as a way to continuously monitor assets, yard traffic, and loading areas, improving both safety and utilization.

3.5 Yard and Trailer Utilization

Another high-value use case is analyzing trailer and container fill levels. Trend reports from global logistics providers highlight how computer vision is used to:
  • Measure pallet and cage dimensions as they enter loading areas.
  • Estimate trailer fill percentage in real time.
  • Detect partially filled trailers before they depart, reducing “shipping air.”
This ties directly into transportation cost and sustainability metrics, making it a natural extension of pallet and carton vision.

4. Business Impact: What the Numbers Look Like

Another high-value use case is analyzing trailer and container fill levels. Trend reports from global logistics providers highlight how computer vision is used to:
  • Measure pallet and cage dimensions as they enter loading areas.
  • Estimate trailer fill percentage in real time.
  • Detect partially filled trailers before they depart, reducing “shipping air.”
Computer vision helps by:
  • Detecting pedestrians in forklift aisles and triggering alerts.
  • Flagging blocked fire exits, blind-spot behavior, or speeding equipment.
  • Capturing near misses (not just actual accidents), so safety teams have data to act before a serious incident.

This ties directly into transportation cost and sustainability metrics, making it a natural extension of pallet and carton vision.

4. Real-World Use Cases: What Manufacturers Are Achieving Today

When you connect the dots between these use cases and warehouse economics, a consistent picture emerges:
  • Inventory accuracy: moving from ~63% to high-90s accuracy through better data and automation dramatically reduces stockouts, overstocks, and emergency shipments.
  • Mispicks and mis-shipments: industry studies repeatedly show average mispick costs of USD 20–30 and annual losses around USD 390k per distribution center, with some analyses placing mispick costs even higher in global, high-value operations.
  • Picking efficiency: AI-driven inventory and picking systems have been reported to boost picking efficiency by up to 58% compared to manual methods, illustrating how better digital workflows directly increase throughput.
  • Safety and downtime: forklift accident statistics show that every avoided incident saves not just medical and compensation costs, but also days or weeks of lost productivity and potential legal exposure.
Computer vision doesn’t replace WMS, RF scanners, or safety training — it amplifies them by turning live operations into continuous, structured data streams that those systems can act on.

5. Implementation Roadmap for Warehouse Computer Vision

A pragmatic rollout usually follows five steps:
  • 1. Baseline the problem
  • Measure current inventory accuracy, mispick rate, rework, and safety incidents.
  • Use existing WMS and safety reports, but acknowledge they may under-report issues.
  • 2. Choose one “lighthouse” use case
  • For example: pallet auditing at inbound docks, carton counting on a key conveyor, or forklift-pedestrian separation in one high-risk zone.
  • Pick an area where you can tie improvements to clear financial or safety KPIs.
  • 3. Deploy cameras and connect to Objiq-style vision models
  • Start with fixed, industrial cameras and proven model architectures for pallet detection, SKU counting, or human-presence detection.
  • Run in shadow mode first (no automation, just alerts and analytics) to validate performance.
  • 4. Integrate with WMS and safety workflows
  • Trigger WMS exceptions when pallet counts don’t match expected quantities.
  • Send safety alerts to supervisors when near-miss thresholds are breached.
  • Store images and events for audits and continuous improvement.
  • 5. Scale across sites and build a “vision data lake”
  • Once ROI is clear on one lane or building, replicate the pattern across other warehouses.
  • Use a central platform to compare performance across sites, vendors, and product families.

6. Where Objiq Fits — and How It Can Power a Wider Ecosystem

For Objiq, warehouse computer vision is not a one-off project. It is an opportunity to become the central nervous system for visual data in logistics operations:
  • Data & model layer
  • Ingest video and images from docks, aisles, and yards.
  • Train and manage models for pallet counting, SKU detection, label reading, and safety analytics.
  • Integration layer
  • Sync with WMS/ERP for inventory and shipment updates.
  • Connect with a communication platform like Vaarta to push real-time alerts (e.g., mis-loads, safety violations) to supervisors on WhatsApp or internal chat.
  • Feed insights into analytics or planning tools for continuous optimization.
  • Use-case library
  • Pre-configured templates for pallet auditing, conveyor counting, cycle counting, forklift safety, and trailer utilization — so each new site starts from a proven reference rather than a blank page.
Over time, Objiq can sit at the center of a Marktine ecosystem: Objiq generates rich operational signals from cameras; Vaarta distributes those signals as conversations and workflows; other analytics and planning tools use those signals to redesign networks, layouts, and labor plans.

7. Conclusion: From Blind Spots to Live, Visual Intelligence

Warehouses are already full of data — but most of it lives in reports and spreadsheets that describe what happened yesterday.
Computer vision changes that by instrumenting the physical world in real time:
  • Pallets and cartons are no longer just rows in a WMS; their actual counts, conditions, and locations are visible as images and events.
  • Safety is no longer just a monthly lagging KPI; near-misses and risky behaviors can be seen and addressed before injuries happen.
  • Inventory accuracy shifts from a twice-a-year panic exercise to a continuous, camera-driven process.
For operations leaders, the question is no longer whether computer vision belongs in warehousing and logistics — the case studies have already answered that. The real question is which use case you start with, and which platform you trust to scale from one door to your entire network.
Objiq’s role is to turn those cameras into a durable competitive edge.